#NICOLE NANCE TIMELY TESTING LTD PRO#

Specifically, Nance claims that her trial counsel’s assistance was ineffective with respect to each of the following issues: (1) the admissibility and utilization of a prior DWI conviction, (2) Nance’s competence to stand trial, and (3) the admissibility, utilization, and refutation of the State’s evidence concerning field-sobriety testing.

#NICOLE NANCE TIMELY TESTING LTD PRO#

Claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel After carefully reviewing Nance’s pro se response and the other pleadings she filed with this Court, it is clear that Nance’s complaint, on appeal, is that she received ineffective assistance from her appointed trial counsel. In the interests of justice, we considered the arguments raised in Nance’s motions as though they were included in her pro se response. Additionally, she filed several pleadings, labeled motions, raising issues that should have been included in her pro se response. Nance availed herself of the opportunity to file a pro se response.

Nance’s appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders 1 brief in this matter detailing the procedural history of the case, summarizing and analyzing the trial evidence, and stating that he found no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Following a hearing on punishment, the trial court sentenced Nance to 250 days in jail. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION Jessica Nicole Nance appeals from her conviction, on an open plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated (DWI), second offense. CR1101695 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 06-13-00223-CR JESSICA NICOLE NANCE, Appellant V. In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No.

Nicole nance timely testing ltd